201006.30
0

Contrasts Between Bhopal and Deepwater Horizon Highlight Differences in Corporate Ethics

The rapid response by BP in setting up a $20 billion compensation fund for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill has resulted in headlines in Indian newspapers alleging double standards.  The reality is a bit more complicated.

The 1983 Union Carbide India Limited pesticide plant disaster is bar far the worst industrial catastrophe in history, causing 2,259 deaths immediately and about 15,000 eventually.  The official estimates from the Indian government are 558,125 injuries, of which 38,478 were partial disablement and about 3,900 were severely and permanently disabled. There are also allegations that 390 tons of toxic chemicals have been abandoned at the plant that continue to leak and pollute the groundwater.

The disaster is also often cited as one of the worst examples of lack of corporate responsibility, employing tactics that reduce or delay financial liabilities.

Delay Court Cases
Some 26 years after the disaster, there are civil and criminal cases still pending in the United States District Court of Manhattan and the District Court of Bhopal.  In some cases, potential defendants are deceased and in many cases, the witnesses can not be expected to remember all the relevant details.

Divert Blame to Elsewhere

The current corporate owners, Dow Chemical Company, has an entire Web site dedicated to denying various allegations against it. The company position is that the disaster was the result of industrial sabotage.

Limit Liability
The company somehow managed to persuade the Indian government  in 1989 of freeing it of any liabilities by making a once-off payment that in no way covered the costs involved.

All of these actions are in stark contrast to the way in which BP is handling the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: rapid admission of guilt, unlimited resources to resolve the problem, and a massive prepayment of compensation.

The allegations of double standards are almost certainly not the result of different treatment for American victims versus Indian victims. They are primarily due to different companies having different corporate ethical standards.

201006.23
0

SocGen Seeks 4.9 Billion Euro in Compensation Claim

The French bank Société Générale SA has told a French court that it wants €4.9 billion in compensation from former employee Jerome Kerviel, who will fact up to five years in prison and a fine of €375,000 if convicted of charges of breach-of-trust, forgery, and entering false data into computers.   Under the French legal system, Société Générale has the right to demand damages as the victim. The amount claimed by Société Générale are the losses from what the bank says were unauthorised trades made by Kerviel.

The court has heard from Kerviel’s direct supervisor, Eric Cordelle, that the trading desk for Kerviel’s team frequently exceeded its trading limits. Cordelle also revealed that he had neither the resources or tools to monitor individual traders’ activities.

201006.20
0

The Third Party Capture Debate in the UK

Insurance firms in the UK increasing are their efforts to reduce the role of solicitors in settling personal injury claims.  One of the most contentious issues is the intensification of third party capture, which involves insurance companies contacting the third party (i.e. the victim of their client) with a claim against their policyholder and making a rapid offer to settle.  The objective is to stop the victim contacting a solicitor.   Solicitors argue that independent legal advice is essential because of the clear conflict of interest for insurance companies, which try to keep their compensation amounts as low as possible.
The practice of third party capture has been around for several years in the UK and has also started to appear in Ireland.  The Association of British Insurers is expected to publish soon a new voluntary code of conduct that specifies how to contact victims and in particular ensures that a victim’s right to independent legal advice is respected.   In the UK, insurance company activities are regulated by the Financial Services Authority and are not subject to the 2006 Compensation Act.  There have been calls for an administrative approach to injury compensation claims in the UK, with the systems in Ireland and New Zealand cited as examples. The Irish insurance successfully lobbied for the creation of the Injuries Board.  There was an immediate drop in the amount of compensation paid to victims – and a corresponding benefit of a drop in insurance premiums and increase in insurance company profits.  However, people are now more aware that they should use a solicitor with the Injuries Board for anything but the most simple personal injury claim.  The injury compensation payouts in Ireland have now returned to more regular levels the interests of victims are now usually represented by solicitors.  However, the Injuries Board has resulted in much faster processing of claims so its overall impact has been beneficial.

201006.14
0

9/11 Workers in $712.5 Million Injury Claims Settlement

An agreement has been reached for compensation for 10,000 workers claiming illnesses following the September 11, 2001, World Trade Center attack in New York City.  The rescue and cleanup workers were exposed to smoke and airborne debris. New York City has agreed on a $712.5 million injury compensation fund.
U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein has stated that victims will be  “assured of a fair deal that puts money in their hand fast”.
The compensation for victims claiming debilitating respiratory diseases who contracted severe asthma within seven months of exposure will receive awards in the range of $800,000 and $1 million. The compensation agreed for deaths is in the range of $1.5 million.
The next step in the process is for at least 95% of the plaintiffs to consent to the agreement to make it legally binding on everyone.
Some interesting aspects of the deal:

  • Workers with no specific injury but who claim fear of becoming sick have been awarded $3,250.
  • Everyone is to get a special insurance policy for $100,00 for specific blood and respiratory cancers.
201006.08
0

Road Traffic Accident Victim Sues Google over Faulty Directions

Google has been named in a road traffic accident claim in the United States. It has been claimed that Google Maps provided Lauren Rosenberg of Los Angeles, California, with dangerous walking directions while she was Park City, Utah.
The compensation claim is primarily against the driver of the car, but Google is also named in the lawsuit because it is alleged that Google Maps told her to walk along “Deer Valley Drive” – which happens to be State Route 224 and does not have a footpath. Google has defended itself by pointing out that the mobile version of Google Maps has a warning: ‘Walking directions (beta): Use caution’. Interestingly, the desktop/laptop version of the warning is more specific about the dangers of using Google Maps for walking directions and contains additional text: “Use caution–This route may be missing sidewalks or pedestrian paths.”

This is the first known example of a mapping serving being named in a pedestrian accident claim. While it is clear that Google is not primarily responsible for the road traffic accident, the solicitors for injured party is claiming contributory negligence.

201005.25
0

Toyota Recall Starts Flood of Compensation Claims

In a ruling that will have important implications worldwide for compensation cases, the US government has proposed a civil penalty of $16.4 million on Toyota because the company  “knowingly hid a dangerous defect” that caused its vehicles to accelerate unexpectedly. Toyota was initially praised by US authorities for the way it handled recalls to repair faulty accelerator pedals on more than 8 million cars globally (including 2.3 million cars and trucks in the USA).

However, it later emerged that Toyota waited at least four months before reporting the faulty accelerator pedals to US regulators, in contravention to safety regulations that require safety defects to be reported in five business days.

Toyota is facing at least 177 consumer and shareholder lawsuits seeking class-action status and at least 56 suits claiming personal injuries or deaths caused by sudden acceleration incidents.  The United States National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has estimated that 52 people have died in Toyota accelerator-related crashes. A much higher number of people have escaped death but been injured. On April 9th, 2010, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered all federal lawsuits related to the Toyota recall should be heard together at the Central District of California before Judge James Selna.

There is also an unusual case of a Toyota Camry driver who claimed he tried to stop his car but crashed into the back of another car, killing three people.  The driver in the read end car accident was sentenced to eight years in prison.  The conviction was unusual because the car was clearly out of control having dodged cars at an intersection prior to finally crashing, and the driver had family members in the car. The investigation at the time focussed on the brakes, which were found to be working correctly, rather than investigating the accelerator.

Toyota car owners in the USA are also suing for the reduced resale value of the cards due to the recalls.  The claim is supported by various industry guides to the resale value of cars, such as Kelley Blue Book, which lowered the resale value of recalled Toyota cars by an average of 3.5 percent.  The price reduction was up to $750 for a Toyota Sequoia.  The lawsuits related to lost resale value are considered a much greater financial liability than the lawsuits related to crashes because there are millions of Toyota car owners that may be entitled to compensation.  In a previous recall in the USA, Ford Explorer owners were given vouchers worth between $300 and $500 towards the cost of a new Ford car.

Toyota Recalls in Ireland

Toyota Ireland announced in February that it was recalling 26,000 cars in Ireland, although this number was later reduced to just over 18,000. There was immediate speculation that drivers whose car was subject to the recall but ignored the recall and any potential problems with their vehicles could be potentially liable in the case of an accident and even face charges related to negligence. Toyota Ireland issued a statement on the issue of legal liability: “A driver of a potentially affected vehicle could only be the subject of a charge under the Road Traffic Act if involved in an accident if he or she is aware that their vehicle is the subject of this recall campaign and that he or she is aware of the signs of wear and tear, symptomatic of the defect in the accelerator mechanism and they have become apparent, namely the accelerator sticking or becoming slow to return to idle, and they continue to drive the vehicle in this condition.”
Toyota is clearly exposed to product liability claims due to its faulty accelerators, and will no doubt be involved in many road traffic accident claims, as well as pedestrian accident claims, claims from passengers in car accidents, and most of all, claims for rear-end car accidents where the rear driver is driving a Toyota car.

201005.22
0

Students Wins Compensation From College That Ignored Special Needs

Rosie Watson, aged 48, a deaf student at Durham University, has reach a settlement of £25,000 after the university repeatedly failed to take her profound deafness into account.

Ms Watson claimed that her tutors were not informed about her special needs due to her deafness or failed to take them into account, and continued to deny assistance even when she requested it.  Ms Watson said that ignoring her special needs effectively meant that the university discriminated against her, which forced her to leave in her third year. The compensation claim was supported by Darlington Association on Disability.

The settlement was to reimburse her college fees, a student loan, but also for injury to her feelings and psychiatric damage.

Durham University denied the claims and paid the compensation to Ms Watson without any admission of liability.

201005.16
1

Bouncy Castle Injury Results in £1 Million Compensation

Sam Harris of Spalding, Lincolnshire, then aged 11, was brain damaged when a boy of 15 kicked him in the head during a somersault. The accident two years ago has left Sam Harris needing constant care.  The resulting child accident injury compensation claim has resulted in a £1 Million compensation payment.

A personal injury case was taken by Janet and David Harris against the parents (Catherine and Timothy Perry) who had hired the bouncy castle on the basis of poor supervision, especially allowing older children by younger children.  High Court Judge David Steel ruled on the question of liability by stating that “The risks of a damaging collision are manifestly enhanced by mixing children of different sizes.”

The household insurance policy of Catherine and Timothy Perry will pay the compensation.

The case was considered something of a landmark case in the UK because it sets the precedent that the person hiring a bouncy castle is liable for injuries suffered by children using the bouncy castle.

A recent UK government survey has estimated that bouncy castles cause up to 3,000 injuries annually in the UK.  If the same rate of injuries applies in Ireland, it implies over 100 injuries in Ireland every year.  A recent bouncy castle injury compensation case in Ireland involved a five-year old girl that broke both wrists on an inflatable slide when she collided with a woman sitting at the bottom of the slide.  A leisure centre in Clonskeagh was ordered in the High Court to pay 20,000 euro in damages.

201005.12
0

Up to One Billion Dollars in Damages Predicted for Diabetes Drug Avandia

The Financial Times has published an article today that estimates that GlaxoSmithKline may have to pay up to US$1 billion to settle the claims from victims of the side effects of the diabetes drug Avandia.

The compensation estimates are based on an early settlement of $60 million with a group of 700 plaintiffs who had claimed that the side effects included strokes and heart attacks.  The primary side effects of the drug are believed to be increased heart disease rates; greater incidence of fractures of the upper arms, hands, and feet of female diabetics; eye damage – macular edema; and hepatotoxicity.

The Financial Times states that it has been estimated that there are about 13,000 people claiming compensation for the side effects of Avandia.

The case for damages and compensation is compounded compounded by the actions of GlaxoSmithKline, which a  November 2007 US Senate Finance Committee report entitled “The Intimidation of Dr. John Buse and the Diabetes Drug Avandia”  accuses the drug firm of intimidation of Dr. Buse, an independent expert with extensive research experience in the thiazolidinedione class of drugs that includes Avandia.  Dr. Buse had expressed concern about Avandia in 1999.

GlaxoSmithKline has defended its development and use of Avandia.

201005.10
0

BP Facing Massive Compensation Claims for Oil Leak

BP is facing massive compensation claims for the Deepwater Horizon rig, which was sunk by an explosion on April 22nd. The result was a burst underwater oil pipe leaking about 10,000 barrels of oil a day.  The questions about contributory negligence have already started, with BP blaming the accident on drilling firm Transocean, the maker of the equipment that alledgedly failed and caused the explosion.  Wikipedia has published a particularly comprehensive article, considering it’s an ongoing event.

201004.26
0

Maclaren Pushchair Injury Compensation

Buggy manufacturer Maclaren has agreed 50 child injury compensation claim payments in the UK for injuries sustained using their buggies. The settlements are made without any admission of liability and Maclaren has defended the safety of its buggies and said that it is a problem that affects all brands.

The cases follow the recall of one million buggies in the USA following finger amputations for 12 children that got their fingers stuck in the hinges.

One million of the Maclaren  buggies were recalled in the US last year after it was revealed that 12 children had to have fingers amputated due to them getting stuck in the mechanisms hinges.  However, Maclaren did not withdraw the exact same products in Europe.  The Maclaren models withdrawn in the USA include Volo, Triumph, Quest Sport, Quest Mod, Techno XT, Techno XLR, Twin Triumph, Twin Techno, and Easy Traveller.

The decision not to withdraw the products in Ireland was condemned by the Irish National Consumer Agency as unacceptable.

If you or your child have suffered a pushchair injury, you should speak to a solicitor about a child injury claim as soon as possible after you receive appropriate medical treatment.

201004.12
0

Punk Legend Malcolm McLaren Dies Of Mesothelioma

Punk legend and former Sex Pistols manager Malcolm McLarend died of mesothelioma, an incurable lung cancer that is most commonly associated with prolonged exposure to asbestos particles.  It is believed that ceiling of his King’s Road, London, clothes store contained asbestos. Although asbestos is no longer used as a building material, the death of Malcolm McLarend illustrates that asbestos is still an important category of workplace injury claims.

201003.28
0

School Bullying Victim Awarded $290,000 Compensation

In a judgement that is seen as a warning for schools in Australia to protect students from bullying, The Supreme Court has approved a $290,000 compensation payout by the Education Department to a teenage girl that suffered bullying over an 18 month period at Kerang Technical High School.

The bullying including spitting at the girl, putting chewing gum in her hair, throwing chairs at her, and emptying her locker across the floor. The girl finally left the school when a student allegedly threatened to shoot her.

The parents of the girl had frequent discussions about bullying with the school principal, teachers, and even the school chaplain. The school failed to deal with the problem and also failed to establish procedures to stop bullying and discipline guilty students.

It was claimed that the bullying left the girl a physical and emotional wreck.  The injuries claimed were psychological disturbance, panic disorder, insomnia, an eating disorder, stress-related psoriasis and suicidal thoughts.

More injury claims for children are expected from parents of Kerang Technical High School.

201002.04
0

Farm Accident Injury Statistics

California Workers’ Compensation Institute has published research that finds that farm accidents cost the California workers’ compensation system $1.46 billion in loss payments, which is 5.5% of Californian Workers’ Compensation claims. The most comment types of injuries included back problems (sprains or strains), minor woulds and skin injuries, and shoulder, arm, knee, and lower leg sprains.

Teagasc the Health and Safety Authority estimate that one-third of Irish workplace deaths take place on farms.  Most accidents involve tractors and  machinery (49%), followed by livestock (15%), falls from a height (12%), and drowning (12%). Unfortunately, the Injuries Board Ireland does not provide information on farm accident claims.

201001.28
0

UK Government Apologises to Thalidomide Survivors

Almost 50 years after thalidomide caused hundreds of severe birth defects in the UK, the Minister for Health has issued an official apology to the victims and offered a £20m support packaget to be administered through the Thalidomide Trust.  A UK government agency had a role in approving the drug in 1958 for use in the UK.

There are nearly 500 thalidomide survivors in the UK, who each receive £18,000 per year from the Thalidomide Trust, which administers the compensation provided by thalidomide’s manufacturer.

Thalidoide is a sedative-hypnotic and multiple myeloma drug that causes severe birth defects may result if the drug is taken during pregnancy. Thalidomide was sold worldwide from 1957 until 1961, including in Ireland, with up to 20,000 victims globally.

The Irish government has yet to apologise for allowing thalidomide to be distributed in Ireland.

201001.25
0

Birth Injury Results in 6.5 Million Pounds Compensation

Rhiannon Hayman of Bridgend, was awarded a compensation package of about £6.5 million arising out of the significant brain damage she suffered at birth in November 1994. Liability for the medical negligence claim was admitted by Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board, who also gave an unreserved apology, and there was agreement compensation package.  Hayman, now 15 years old, was born at the Princess of Wales Hospital in Bridgend and suffered a severe lack of oxygen during the procedure. Hayman needs 24-hour care and assistance for the rest of her life.

The settlement is a model for how compensation for injuries that require long term care should be packaged, consisting of a lump sum of more than £2 million and annual payments of between £105,000 to £160,000.

201001.11
0

Soldier Awarded 22,000 Pounds for Racial Abuse

A former Welsh Guard soldier of Jamaican origin has been awarded over £22,000 in damages for racial abuse.  Private Kerry Hylton was serving as as a chef in the Welsh Guards when he left in March 2008.  He had served five years of service with the Royal Logistics Corps, apparently without any problems. It was claimed that Hylton suffered regular verbal abuse. It was alleged that Hylton and his family were locked in their army quarters after someone glued their door shut. It was also alleged that Hylton was arrested and assaulted by the Royal Military Police when he made a complaint. The award consisted of £18,500 for injury to feelings, £1,500 for aggravated damages, and £2,202 in interest.

200912.27
0

Cashier Receives Workplace Injury Compensation Following Attempted Robbery

A 69 year old cashier at a Roadchef motorway service station has received £36,000 in workplace injury compensation for injuries received during an attempted robbery.  Roadchef admitted that it has not ensured a safe working environment.  The incident took place in March 2008 when three hooded youths attempted to steal money from the cashier’s till.  The cashier tried to uncover the youth so that his face would be caught on closed-circuit television. The cashier fell to the ground and hurt her knee in the resulting struggle. Another cashier shut the till and the robbers left with nothing. The victim needed injections for pain and physiotherapy and eventually retired under medical advice.

She needed steroid injections to help with the pain in her knee, had to undergo physiotherapy, and also suffers from arthritis.

The case demonstrates the need for employers to protect workers from potential violence.  The entire incident was probably avoidable with a proper risk assessment and robbery counter measures.

200911.29
0

Siblings Awarded $2.5 Million For Toxic Lead Paint Exposure

A Baltimore City brother and sister have recently been awarded $2.5 for their exposure in a West Baltimore house that was sold to the family as safe from lead paint by a nonprofit organisation called City Homes.

The charity pointed out that the home passed city lead inspections before and after the siblings had lived there and also that the charity had been responsive to all of the claimant’s concerns.

However, experts testified that the house was not fully “lead safe” and that both siblings have below average IQs as a result of lead paint poisoning. The jury heard evidence that there had been efforts to reduce the possibility of lead paint exposure, that there was paint chipping and flaking on surfaces, that rats had chewed at the walls and had brought lead dust through the house.

Lead paint was banned in 1978 in the United States by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.  Lead paint poisoning can cause severe and permanent brain damage and developmental problems in children, nervous system injury seizures or convulsions, growth or mental retardation, and comas. In extreme cases, it can cause death.

200911.26
0

Over Three Million Sterling Compensation for Hospital Negligence

Mark Thomas has just been awarded £3.2million in compensation for failure to diagnose meningitis, compounded by the fact that the victim was turned away from Walsall Manor Accident and Emergency Department and his parents were admonished at the time for ‘misusing the emergency services’.  It took a second opinion five days after the initial hospital visit to determine that Mark Thomas had meningitis.

In this tragic case, Mark Thomas has been left with brain damage and no short term memory and will never be able to work or live without a carer. The NHS trust involved has apologised to the family.

Meningitis is inflammation of the protective membranes covering the brain and spinal cord. Some of the common symptoms include headaches, neck stiffness, fever, confusion, vomiting, and light or noise intolerance. Meningitis is  life-threatening and has a high mortality rate if untreated and delayed treatment can result in brain damage.  Wide-spectrum antibiotics are therefore normally prescribed immediately, even before confirmatory tests are conducted.